Israel-Hamas Ceasefire: Three Israeli Hostages Freed After 15 Months[1]

Discover the latest breakthrough in the Israel-Hamas conflict as a three-phase ceasefire proposal leads to the release of three Israeli hostages after 15 months, paving the way for a more sustainable calm and improved success in the region.

· 6 min read
Three Israeli hostages reunited with families after 15 months in Hamas captivity, marking the start of a fragile Israel-

The Israel-Hamas Conflict: A Comprehensive Analysis

The Israel-Hamas conflict, which erupted on October 7, 2023, with a devastating Hamas attack on Israel, has been one of the most catastrophic and complex conflicts in the region's recent history. This conflict has left deep scars across the Middle East, affecting not only Israel and Gaza but also the broader regional and international landscape.

The October 7, 2023, Attack

The conflict began with a stunning and coordinated attack by Hamas on October 7, 2023, during the Jewish holiday of Shemini Atzeret. This assault was unprecedented in its scale and ferocity. Hamas militants launched over 2,200 rockets into Israel within a 20-minute period, overwhelming Israel's Iron Dome defense system. Simultaneously, at least 1,500 militants infiltrated Israel through multiple points along the heavily fortified border, using explosives and bulldozers to breach the defenses. They also disabled communication networks, allowing them to attack military installations and enter civilian neighborhoods undetected. Additionally, militants breached the maritime border near the coastal town of Zikim and crossed into Israel using motorized paragliders[1][3][5].

This attack resulted in the deaths of over 1,200 people, primarily Israeli civilians, including families in their homes and attendees of an outdoor music festival. The attack also included instances of sexual violence against victims before they were killed, as reported by a March 2024 United Nations report. More than 240 people were taken hostage, many of whom were taken from their homes and the music festival. These hostages included Israelis with dual citizenship, drawing several countries into the efforts to secure their release[1][3][5].

Israel's Response and the War in Gaza

The day following the attack, Israel declared a state of war for the first time since the Yom Kippur War in 1973. The Israel Defense Forces (IDF) launched a comprehensive military campaign against Hamas in the Gaza Strip, beginning with airstrikes and later involving ground troops and armored vehicles. The war led to the displacement of over 1.4 million Palestinians, with more than 46,000 Gazans killed and two-thirds of the buildings in the Gaza Strip damaged or destroyed. The humanitarian situation in Gaza deteriorated significantly, with widespread food shortages, the spread of diseases, and massive displacement of the population[1][2][4].

Ceasefire Agreement and Hostage Exchange

After months of intense violence, a ceasefire agreement was finally reached on January 15, 2025, mediated by the United States, Qatar, and Egypt. This agreement involves a three-phase plan aimed at reducing the bloodshed and initiating a process of reconstruction and potential governance changes in Gaza.

In the first phase, Hamas will release thirty-three hostages, including women, children, and those over fifty years of age, while Israel will release hundreds of Palestinian prisoners and facilitate a significant increase in humanitarian aid into Gaza. Subsequent phases include the release of remaining male hostages, Israel's withdrawal from Gaza, and the beginning of reconstruction efforts. This agreement is critical in addressing the immediate humanitarian needs and setting the stage for longer-term solutions[4].

Governance of Gaza

The governance of Gaza remains a contentious issue. Hamas has controlled Gaza since 2007, and the current ceasefire does not resolve the question of who will govern Gaza post-conflict. Hamas demands a role in Gaza’s governance as a precondition for any agreement. The Palestinian Authority, led by President Mahmoud Abbas, is involved in the discussions but faces significant challenges in asserting its authority in Gaza due to its diminished legitimacy among the Palestinian public[2].

Public Reaction and Polling

The public reaction to the conflict and the ceasefire agreement is complex and varied. Support for the October 7 Hamas offensive has declined significantly among Palestinians, especially in the Gaza Strip. However, many Palestinians believe the attack has put the Palestinian issue back at the center of regional and international attention. In Israel, the public is divided, with a significant portion prioritizing the recovery of hostages and negotiating a permanent ceasefire. International public opinion is also split, with widespread blame for the continuation of the fighting directed at Israel, Hamas, and Iran[3].

Expert Perspectives

Experts view the ceasefire agreement with a mix of optimism and caution. Steven A. Cook, CFR’s Eni Enrico Mattei Senior Fellow for Middle East and Africa Studies, noted that the agreement is a potentially important step in bringing the war in Gaza to an end. "After the successful completion of the first phase, subsequent phases include a permanent ceasefire and the reconstruction of Gaza. The agreement will save lives by stopping the fighting and allowing for more humanitarian assistance to reach Gazans in need," he said[5].

Jonathan Panikoff, director of the Atlantic Council’s Scowcroft Middle East Security Initiative, emphasized that the ceasefire has multiple stages that, if broken, could result in a resumption of fighting. "Hamas is likely to abide by the cease-fire. Palestinians have everything to lose if it doesn’t. As we saw during the war, the driver of what happens next—whether the cease-fire lasts past the first phase—is Israel," he highlighted. Panikoff also noted the critical role of the US in maintaining the fragile peace and influencing regional policies[4].

Future Implications

Governance of Gaza

The question of who will govern Gaza post-conflict remains unresolved. The most optimistic scenario involves Hamas relinquishing power in exchange for lasting calm and reconstruction, but this is contingent on various factors, including Israel’s willingness to make compromises. The Palestinian Authority's role in this scenario is uncertain, given its diminished legitimacy among Palestinians[2].

Sustainability of Ceasefire

The ceasefire has multiple stages, and any breach could result in a resumption of fighting. The sustainability of the ceasefire depends on the adherence of both parties and the support of international actors. As Cook noted, "Just because there’s a deal doesn’t mean that it will hold. The division of the agreement into three phases makes it vulnerable to vigorous opposition on both sides"[5].

Reconstruction and Normalization

The future of Gaza’s reconstruction and the normalization of relations between Israel and its neighbors are uncertain. These issues will be addressed in the later phases of the agreement and will depend on the cooperation of various stakeholders. The Gulf states may play a crucial role in funding reconstruction efforts, and the expansion of the Abraham Accords under new U.S. leadership could influence the regional political landscape[2][4].

Regional and International Dynamics

The conflict has sparked increased regional tensions across the Middle East. Hezbollah fighters in Lebanon have engaged in cross-border skirmishes with the IDF, Yemen’s Houthi rebels have shot missiles at Israel and commercial ships in the Red Sea, and other Iran-backed groups have launched dozens of attacks on U.S. military positions in Iraq and Syria. Iran's direct involvement in the war, marked by the launch of over 300 drones and missiles at Israel in April 2024, has further escalated tensions. The U.S. and other allies have advised against actions that could further widen the war, emphasizing the need for a balanced and cautious approach[3].

Humanitarian Crisis

The humanitarian situation in Gaza has reached catastrophic levels. The widespread destruction of civilian infrastructure has had a rapid and devastating impact on Gaza and its two million residents. About 90% of Gaza’s population has been displaced, most multiple times, and the entire population needs humanitarian assistance. Persistent Israeli restrictions on the flow of humanitarian aid and the movement of humanitarian staff have made it extremely difficult for humanitarian organizations to respond to the needs of the population. The death toll in Gaza, estimated at around 42,000 by the Hamas-run Gazan Health Ministry, underscores the severity of the crisis[2][4].

Conclusion

The Israel-Hamas ceasefire and the release of Israeli hostages mark a tentative step towards reducing violence, but the long-term political and governance issues in Gaza remain unresolved. The agreement's success hinges on the cooperation of key stakeholders, international support, and the ability to address the underlying governance and reconstruction challenges.

As the region embarks on this fragile path towards peace, it is clear that the road ahead will be fraught with challenges. The visuals of devastation in Gaza, the trauma endured by both Israelis and Palestinians, and the geopolitical intricacies all point to a complex and delicate situation. However, the hope for lasting calm and reconstruction offers a glimmer of light in what has been one of the darkest periods in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

The international community, particularly the United States, Qatar, and Egypt, will play a crucial role in ensuring the sustainability of the ceasefire and facilitating the reconstruction of Gaza. The involvement of other regional actors, such as the Gulf states, could also be pivotal in providing the necessary financial and political support for rebuilding Gaza and stabilizing the region.

Ultimately, the resolution of the Israel-Hamas conflict will require a multifaceted approach that addresses the political, humanitarian, and security dimensions of the crisis. It will necessitate compromise, cooperation, and a commitment to finding a lasting and just solution for all parties involved.